Comparison between plain and stringer-reinforced sheet from the shear lag standpoint

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author M. Fine en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-21T15:52:09Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-21T15:52:09Z
dc.date.issued 1941 en_US
dc.identifier.other ARC/R&M-2648 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/3189
dc.description.abstract In R. & Ms. 2098, 2099, 2100 the stringer-sheet method of solving shear lag problems in stringer reinforced sheet was developed. The present report compares for two simple cases the solution for the plain sheet with that for the stringer-reinforced sheet. The solutions are practically identical by the two methods provided that the sheet is considered fully effective in taking end load. This leads to the conclusion that, in regions of tensile stress, at all events, all the skin area is to be included in the stringer area when applying this method. en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Aeronautical Research Council Reports & Memoranda en_US
dc.title Comparison between plain and stringer-reinforced sheet from the shear lag standpoint en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AERADE


Browse

My Account